In response to grant's post..

Politics are like assholes. You basically have to pick the one that stinks the least.

Underneath, there's strong pulls that Obama is a socialist.
That's how democrats generally are anyways (as with the "liberal" mindset)

Yes, i'm an extremely liberal person, but as far as the presidential position goes, i'd rather have a conservative dick in office than someone who's gonna try and change absolutely everything (Becuase if huckabee won, he'd make us all skinny right)

Its really a matter of opinion

Ron Paul is a constitutionalist.
He takes a stance at least that's been show so far.. away from business/government ties
which also leads him to be one of the most popular candidates to internet enthusiasts, pirates, etc.
Yes, he has a conservative mindset, but I still am opinionated in that the internet is the only free method of unmoderated speech left in the world and it should stay that way. Hell I'll stand by how it is till the end of time.

So back to the lesser of the evils, honestly.. politicans are all two-faced, there's nothing that's going to change that solely because of the amount of pressure companies and other politicians as well as the public eye puts upon them.

But yeah, right now my support would be with either Ron Paul or Obama, but Obama (based on what he's said so far) could easily take the things he stands on into an extremist socialist-like reform movement if congress supports of course (unless you're bush, congress doesn't matter then right?).

But eh, you never know. Its like inevitable failing russian roulette. Either one you pick and you'll probably shoot yourself in the foot for it or they'll change. So whatever at this point.

BTW grant, you fail at blogging.
you really do
(ZOMG POST 10 THINGS IN ONE DAY ABOUT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. LAWLS guyz I saw a movie go me. Oh look LOL @ matt. Now i shall blog about it)


Dumbass.


Oh and i know there's different kinds of gamers
The ones who suck (360) and the hardcore true team players (PC) and then the casual market (wii/ds/etc.).

Yeah.
And Gears of war and halo2 are stupid microsoft mistakes to begin with not reflecting the true market of the year. Both were better in the PC versions i might add, just aged and different.
Games using mice also tend to be faster paced shooters due to the pure reflex that is abled by using that instead of a shitty joystick
Halo 3 feels like a crawling speed game as opposed to fast paced pc shooters.

Lets recap releases that both came out on PC and console shall we?

Bioshock - Graphics better on PC.
Orange Box - Better on PC due to the integration with Steam. Gameplay is more fun in HL2 using a keyboard/mouse setup anyways. I've played the xbox port before and its nowhere near as appealing. TF2 has extra mods/map support for PC that is lacking on 360.
UT3 - undoubtedly better on PC and even PS3 thanks to Keyboard/mouse support as well as mods. Xbox is going to be questioning the use of mods even still. (LAME)
Crysis - Wow, that just blew everything ever SEEN on console out of the water. And its actually fun as opposed to Far Cry.

Its quite funny actually, becuase the multiplayer community on XBL can only really be seen in the higher ranks of halo.
Its really amusing actually, since across the board i have a more enjoyable experience in PC shooters since all the players are all more apt to work together and actually play as a team as opposed to console.
I guess its reflected in the types of games that come out for each too however. (Tactical based shooters are tons more prominent on PC than straight shoot em ups on console).


But you know, whatever. I suppose it is just pure preference. Hence why its opinion you dumbass.
Once again, its retarded to make posts that are opinions of the other person's post on a blog but you asked for it. = P